Stereotypes allow information to be more easily and swiftly identified, predicted and reacted to: ”without [them] everything would be treated as if it were taking place for the first time” (Helmreich, 2017, p. 7). Whereas myths can be described as commonly and uncritically accepted sets of propositions whose truth has not been examined (Heehs, 1994, pp. 1-3). Though stereotypes and myths generally help make sense of the complex world that people live in, they oftentimes turn out to be sources of biases and over-generalisations. Organised crime groups (OCGs) present a particularly fertile ground for the emergence of various simplifications and categorisations due to the nature of the phenomenon. This stems from the difficulty in obtaining accurate and reliable data as well as the controversy surrounding acts committed by criminal actors. In particular, ethnicity and migration serve as the basis for development of various myths and stereotypes related to the criminal world.
There have been some remarkable works that greatly contributed to the literature on the consequences of generalisations and misrepresentations related specifically to ethnicity of members of OCGs (e.g., Rawlinson, 1998; Lombardo, 2010). One of the key points that can be noted when examining scholarly discussion is the significance of neutrality and impartiality of policymakers and law enforcement agencies in tackling organised crime. The purpose of this article is to contribute to the debate by highlighting the importance of evaluating established stereotypes and myths in relation to OCGs. By studying Russian and Greek organised crime groups, it argues that OCGs are not simply foreign phenomena imported from abroad.
The definition of organised crime
Despite the fact that terms ’criminal organisation’ and ’mafia’ are applied on a daily basis in conversations and news broadcasts, there are no universal definitions of these phenomena and their meaning often arouses controversy. Interestingly, the understanding of the notions may greatly differ between scholars and governments. Furthermore, it can be distinctly defined by domestic and international organisations aimed specifically at fighting OCGs.
The heterogeneity of organised crime in Europe requires that organised crime is defined in a clear but, at the same, an all-encompassing manner. Symeonidou-Kastanidou (2007) proposes a framework where an OCG is regarded as an organisation which:
a) is characterised by an allocation of roles between its members,
b) possesses an abundance of technical and – notably– financial means, which it utilises for the fulfillment of its criminal objectives, or is involved in legitimate financial structures ceding high profits,
c) aims at the acquisition of wealth on a massive scale.
Instead of focusing solely on who OCGs are, an emphasis is put on the entrepreneurial element of OCGs. The aforementioned explanation of OCGs will be applied throughout the article. It is also necessary to highlight that mafias and organised crime groups are not synonyms. A mafia group should be regarded as a certain form of OCG which wields power through controlling both illegal and legal economic activities within a certain territory (Paoli, 2003).
(Mis)representations of Russian organised crime
After the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991, the flow of goods and people between eastern and western parts of Europe became less costly, smoother and, thus, more frequent. This provoked concerns among citizens of various European states that they would be flooded by Russian organised crime (Varese, 2001). Together with this concern, a considerable amount of stereotyping and mythicised conceptualisation of Russian OCGs has diffused and still persists to this day within and outside of Europe.
Portrayals of Russian organised crime can be observed in popular series (e.g., McMafia), cinema (e.g., John Wick, The Equaliser), and newspaper articles (as shown by Rawlinson, 1998). As a consequence, Russian OCGs tend to be associated with ethnical homogeneity and racketeering as their dominant criminal activity. However, criminal groups operating within a territory as vast as former Soviet Union, to a large extent differ in terms of geographical location, composition, level of sophistication, ethnic background of their members, available resources, and types of criminal activity. As reported by the Russian Ministry of Internal Affairs, in 1999 more than 140 OCGs operated in the Sverdlovsk region alone (Finckenauer and Voronin, 2001, p. 17). It would seem rather implausible to expect uniformity from Russian OCGs since there are so many distinct groups that fall into this array.
Indeed, criminal groups sometimes restrict membership according to some criteria, such as kinship, race or ethnicity. However, available data suggests that, in contrast to the United States (US) where ”organised crime provided a ’crooked ladder of upward mobility’ for some immigrants sharing a common ethnicity, culture, and language” (Finckenauer and Voronin, 2001, p. 4; O’Kane, 1992), OCGs in the former Soviet Union were not primarily built upon family or ethnic structures. The case of criminal group vory-v-zakone can be used to explain why the notion of ethnically homogeneous Russian organised crime is erroneous.
Despite harsh state repression and deep transformation of both legal and illegal markets, vory-v-zakone (English: thieves-in-law) continues to engage in criminal activity in Russia and in several foreign territories. Consisting of about 5,000 members, vory, along with the Japanese Yakuza, the Mexican Las Zetas, the Neapolitan Camorra, and the MS-13, was recognised as one of the greatest security threats in the US in 2011 (White House, 2011). Vory,which emerged from gulags (Soviet labour camps), despite some characteristics of exclusivity, such as initiation rituals, division of roles, signs (e.g., tattoos), collective beliefs and code of conduct, tends to be open to all ethnicities and minorities within the domestic territory (Varese, Lonsky and Podvysotskiy, 2021). Russians, Georgians, Armenians, Azerbaijanis and many others are known to have formed the criminal group in the past (Razinkin, 1995).
The evidence suggests that the group consists of criminals coming from diverse ethnic backgrounds who shared common circumstances in the past. As the recruitment and selection is not restricted by ethnicity or nationality, the participation in the OCG seems to come down to economic and situational considerations, rather than the ethnic ones. Social relations between individuals are key to understanding participation in Vory.
Certain immigrant or ethnic groups have been commonly associated with involvement in particular criminal activities. While Turkish and Chinese criminal professionals are thought to be leading trafficking of heroin, Columbians tend to be perceived as prominent cocaine traffickers and Russian OCGs are oftentimes portrayed as constituting the main problem of racketeering and violent criminal acts (Kleemans, 2014). Violent reputation of Russian crime groups could help explain why a self-employed sex worker of Russian origin ”may be able to keep pimps and bodyguards at a distance, by pretending to have connections with the Russian Mafia” (Bovenkerk, Siegel and Zaitch 2003).
Those involved in Russian organised crime, however, are known to engage in a range of activities domestically and internationally. Apart from arson, kidnapings, and extortion of money, Russian OCGs have engaged in gambling, corruption, drugs and human trafficking, health care fraud, forgery, counterfeting, antiquities swindles, natural resources and arms trafficking, insurance scams, and fuel tax evasion (Finckenauer and Waring, 1998; Finckenauer and Voronin, 2001; Savona and Riccardi, 2015). Furthermore, in contrast to common misconceptions, Russian OCGs operating in Finland are known to solely engage in three illegal activities: illicit drugs, trafficking in human beings and illicit trade in tobacco products (Savona and Riccardi, 2015, p. 97).
Greek organised crime groups
In the 1990s Greece has been a final destination for a large number of immigrants coming from different locations and contexts. While the total number of foreigners is difficult to estimate, only between 1991 and 1994 about 250,000 immigrants entered the country populated by about 11 million people, majority of which were of Albanianorigin followed by Bulgarians, Georgians, Romanians, Russians, and Ukrainians (Tsoutsoumpis, 2018). Greece was not prepared to receive such an immense number of immigrants, thus, from the beginning this considerable flow of people has been viewed as a security threat and no integration policies were introduced (Nomikos, 2010).
Although it was crime groups already present in Greece that greatly benefitted from immigration through involvement in and coordination of human smuggling, human trafficking and forgery of documents; an increase in petty and street crimes associated with the flow of people resulted in a proliferation of hate towards immigrants, xenophobia and nationalism among the Greek population (Clogg, 2002; Tsoutsoumpis, 2018). Fueled by political discourse and radicalising media broadcasts, fear of immigration intensified among members of the public which blamed foreigners for implementing organised crime in Greece (Antonopoulos, 2009).
Despite the efforts of law enforcement agencies, the illegal cigarette market in Greece is thriving. According to the report prepared by Harvard School of Public Health for the World Health Organisation (2011, p.154), the estimated 543,951,000 pieces of cigarettes were seized in Greece only in 2010. One of the substantial causes why OCGs engage in cigarette market may stem from the increases in taxes of tobacco products sold in Greece. The current cigarettes’ taxation (as a share of the average retail price) in Greece amounts to 84.7%, whereas it totals 69.5% in Luxembourg and 71% in Germany (European Commission, 2022). Furthermore, about 39% of the adults in Greece are daily smokers compared with the OECD average of 19.7% (OECD, 2016).
This suggests that the illegal tobacco market in Greece may be of particular interest to those criminals involved in smuggling goods into the illicit markets where they are heavily taxed and demand is high (Jossens and Raw, 2012). Nonetheless, it is not mafia-like organisations, as portrayed in media, that engage in cigarette smuggling in Greece. The evidence collected by the Hellenic Police suggests that they are dynamic and adaptable networks where roles and responsibilities are distributed within various phases of the supply chain (Vidali, 2017).
While not all criminal networks have an identical structure, some patterns in terms of division of labour and ethnicity were identified in a comprehensive work by Antonopoulos (2009, p. 484), namely: wholesalers – usually Greek, but also Polish or Russian; procurers – mainly Greek businessmen; pushers – tend to be immigrants; street-sellers – members of migrant communities; Legitimate shop and kiosk owners – Greek; protectors – Russian, Albanian and Greek; scouters, warehouse guards and drivers – mixed ethnicities. Finally, the remaining element are corrupt officials (e.g., coast guards, customs and police officers) who are solely Greek and are either paid to ignore the problem or are actively engaged in the operations, e.g., through providing information about prospective investigations (Chionis, and Chalkia, 2016).
It is clear that illicit cigarette market is not dominated by foreigners and substantial interactions between individuals of various ethnic backgrounds can be identified. OCGs engaged in cigarettes smuggling are usually ethnically heterogeneous and the distribution of roles between native Greeks and foreigners depends on the stage of supply chain and associated risks. Therefore, in contrast to stereotypes and myths established in Greek culture, only certain tasks, e.g., street-sellers, scouters, warehouse guards and drivers, are normally carried out by certain ethnic or migrant groups, whereas Greeks tend to have leadership roles (Antonopoulos, 2008).
Studying and understanding myths and stereotypes related to ethnicity and OCGs is crucial since practices and policies based on misconceptions are not likely to be effective in the heterogeneous reality of organised crime. Apart from criminalisation and stigmatisation of certain ethnic and minority groups, biased combat against OCGs can reduce the chances of its success. This article has shown that criminal groups that can be gathered under the umbrella of Russian and Greek OCGs are very diverse in terms of members’ ethnicity and types of criminal activities that they engage in. Also, they are not mafia-like organisations and were not imported from abroad. While the ethnicity element should not be completely ignored by those tackling crimes, objectivity, facts and reliable data should be central in order to better understand the participation and recruitment channels of different criminal groups.
Antonopoulos, G. A. (2008) ’The Greek connection(s): the social organisation of the cigarette
smuggling business in Greece’. European Journal of Criminology. 5(3). pp. 263-288. doi:10.1177/1477370808090832.
Antonopoulos, G. A. (2009) ‘Are the ‘others’ coming?’: Evidence on ‘alien conspiracy’ from three illegal markets in Greece. Crime Law and Social Change. 52(1). pp. 475-493. doi: 10.1007/s10611-009-9204-2
Baika, L. and Campana, P. (2020) ‘Centrality, Mobility, and Specialization: A Study of Drug Markets in a Non-metropolitan Area in the United Kingdom’, Journal of Drug Issues. 50(2). pp. 107-126. doi: 10.1177/0022042619891962
Bovenkerk, F., Siegel, D. and Zaitch, D. (2003) ’Organized crime and ethnic reputation manipulation’. Crime Law and Social Change. 39(1). pp. 23-38. doi:10.1023/A:1022499504945
Chionis, D. and Chalkia, A. (2016) ’Illicit tobacco trade in Greece: the rising share of illicit consumption during crisis’.Trends in Organized Crime. 19. doi: 10.1007/s12117-016-9273-4.
Clogg, R. (2002) A Concise History of Greece. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
European Commission (2022) Excise Duty Tables: Part III – Manufactured Tobacco. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/tedb/taxSearch.html (Accessed: 12 Jul 2022).
Europol (2013) SOCTA 2013. EU Serious and Organised Crime Threat Assessment. Available at: https://www.europol.europa.eu/activities-services/main-reports/eu-serious-and-organised-crime-threat-assessment-socta-2013 (Accessed: 15 Jun 2022).
Europol (2021) About Europol. Available at: https://www.europol.europa.eu (Accessed: 15 Jun 2022).
Fijnaut C. and Paoli L. (2004) Organised crime in Europe: concepts, patterns and control policies in the European Union and beyond. Dordrecht: Springer. pp 21-46.
Fickenauer, J. O. (2005) ’Problems of Definition: What Is Organized Crime?’. Trends in Organized Crime. 8(3).
Finckenauer, J. O. and Voronin, Y. A. (2001) The Threat of Russian Organized Crime. Available at: https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/nij/187085.pdf (Accessed: 17 Jun 2022).
Finckenauer, J. O. and Waring, E. J. (1998) Russian Mafia in America: immigration, Culture and Crime. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
Forsaith, J., Irving, B., Nanopoulos, E. and Fazekas, M. (2012) ’Study for an impact assessment on a proposal for a new legal framework on the confiscation and recovery of criminal assets’. RAND Europe. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/sites/default/files/e-library/docs/external_study_used_as_a_basis_for_the_commission_ia_october_2012_en.pdf (Accessed: 20 Jun 2022).
Gambetta, D. (1993) The Sicilian Mafia. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Hall, S. ,Critcher, C., Jefferson, T. Clarke J. and Roberts, B. (1978) Policing The Crisis: Mugging, The State, and Law and Order. London: Macmillan Press.
Harvard School of Public Health (2011) The Greek Tobacco Epidemic. Available at: https://www.who.int/fctc/reporting/party_reports/greece_annex1_the_greek_tobacco_epidemic_2011.pdf (Accessed: 19 Jun 2022).
Heehs, P. (1994) ’Myth, History, and Theory’. History and Theory, 33(1). pp. 1-19. doi:10.2307/2505649
Helmreich, W. (2017) The Things They Say behind Your Back: Stereotypes and the Myths Behind Them. New York: Routledge.
Hobbs, D. and Antonopoulos, G. A. (2013) ’Endemic to the species’: Ordering the ‘other’ via organised crime’. Global Crime. 14(1). doi:10.1080/17440572.2012.753324
Jossens, L. and Raw, M. (2012) ’From cigarette smuggling to illicit tobacco trade’. Tobacco Control. 21(2). pp. 230-234. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050205
Kleemans, E. R. (2009) ’Human Smuggling and Human Trafficking’, in Oxford Handbook on Crime and Public Policy, eds. Tonry, M. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 409-427
Kleemans, E. R. (2014) ’Theoretical Perspectives on Organized Crime’, in Oxford Handbook of Organized Crime, eds. Paoli, L. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lombardo, R. M. (2010) ’The hegemonic narrative and the social construction of deviance: the case of the black hand’. Trends in Organised Crime. 13(4). pp. 263-282. doi:10.1007/s12117-010-9094-9
Nomikos, J. M. (2010) ’Illegal Immigration and Organized Crime In Greece’. Research Institute For European and American Studies.
OECD (2016) OECD Factbook 2015-2016: Smoking. Available at: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/economics/oecd-factbook-2015-2016/smoking_factbook-2015-89-en (Accessed: 19 Jun 2022).
O’Kane, J. M. (1992) The Crooked Ladder. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
Paoli, L. (2003) Mafia Brotherhoods: Organized Crime, Italian Style. New York: Oxford University Press.
Potter, G. W. (1994) Criminal Organizations: Vice, Racketeering and Politics in an American City. Waveland: Prospect Heights.
Rawlinson, P. (1998) ’Mafia, Media and Myth: Representations of Russian Organised Crime’. The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice. 37(4). pp. 346-358. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2311.00105
Razinkin, V. S. (1995) ’Vory v Zakone’ i Prestupnye Klany. Moskva: Kriminologicheskaya Assotsiatsiya.
Savona, E. U. and Riccardi, M. (2015) From illegal markets to legitimate businesses: the portfolio of organised crime in Europe. Available at: https://www.transcrime.it/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/ocp.pdf (Accessed: 20 Jul 2022).
Symeonidou-Kastanidou, E. (2007) ’Towards a New Definition of Organised Crime in the European Union’. European Journal of Crime. pp. 83-103. doi: 10.1163/092895607X193551
Tsoutsoumpis, S. (2018) ’The Far Right in Greece. Paramilitarism, Organized Crime and the Rise of ‘Golden Dawn’’. Südosteuropa. 66(4). pp. 503-531.
Van Duyne, P. C. (2004) ’The creation of a threat image. Media, policy making and organised crime’, in Threats and phantoms of organised crime, corruption and terrorism, eds. van Duyne P. C., Jager M., von Lampe K. and Newell J. L. pp. 21-50. Nijmegen: Wolf Legal Publishers.
Varese, F. (1994) ’Is Sicily the future of Russia? Private protection and the rise of the Russian Mafia’. European Journal of Sociology. 35(2), pp. 224-258. doi: 10.1017/S0003975600006858
Varese F. (1998) ’The society of the vory-v-zakone, 1930s-1950s’. Cahiers du monde russe: Russie, Empire russe, Union soviétique, États indépendants. 39(4). pp. 515-538. doi: https://doi.org/10.3406/cmr.1998.2538
Varese, F. (2001) The Russian Mafia: Private Protection in a New Market Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Varese, F., Lonsky, J. and Podvysotskiy, Y. (2021) ’The Resilience of the Russian mafia: An Empirical Study’. The British Journal of Criminology. 61(1). pp. 143-166. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azaa053
Vidali, S. (2017) ’Beyond the limits’. The Criminal Politics Today. Law Library Publications. Athens.
von Lampe, K. (2002) ’The Trafficking in Untaxed Cigarettes in Germany: A Case Study of the Social Embeddedness of Illegal Markets’, in Upperworld and Underworld, Cross-Border Crime, eds. Van Duyne, P. C., von Lampe, K. and Passas, N. Nijmegen: Wolf Legal Publishers. pp.141-161.
White House (2011) Remarks at White House Release of Strategy to Combat Transnational Organized Crime. Available at: https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2011/07/25/remarks-white-house-release-strategy-combat-transnational-organized-crim (Accessed: 20 Jul 2022).
Xenakis, S. (2006) ’International norm diffusion and organised crime policy: the case of Greece’. Global Crime. 6(3). pp. 345-373.
Zagaris, B. (2015) International White Collar Crime: Cases and Materials. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 168-211.